Architecture
Of all the states founded in Europe by the Germans in the era of the great migration of peoples, the state of the Franks was the strongest and played the most important role in the implementation of cultural and political tasks of the time, and in the development of the visual arts, which led to new artistic forms content. The Frankish state, which at first occupied the west of modern Germany and northeastern France and gradually covered the whole of France and a significant part of Northern and Southern Germany, already dominated over the whole area of Roman provincial art in Merovingian time; in Gaul, this art - probably under direct Eastern Christian influence, which penetrated part through Ravenna, part, as Strigovsky believed, through Marseille, - already in Merovingian time, it became an ancient Christian art, but with a peculiar imprint (see above, p. 1) ; The legacy of this art of the Merovingian Frankish state also lived in the Carolingian era. Carolingian, as well as Ottonian, art was far from consciously creating on a new, German basis; on the contrary, the art of these epochs, essentially conservative, sought to continue the traditions of Christian antiquity. From this, the idea of the “Carolingian Renaissance” was born in science, which in fact was, in contrast to the Ottoman, more likely a relic of the old than “rebirth”. Those specific German elements that are contained in the Carolingian art, along with elements of the Hellenistic and Oriental, are perceived by them rather unconsciously; but these elements, undoubtedly existing, led to fruitful new growths. Whereas secular, court art held more antiquity, religious art, cultivated mainly in Benedictine monasteries, but also enjoyed the support and patronage of the Parisian and Aachenian courtyards, in many cases went its own way and developed, especially in architecture, a number of practical and ideological innovations that preceded the Romanesque style of the subsequent era. Although such a connoisseur of medieval architecture, like Degio, on the basis of the plans of many churches of the Carolingian era, called the Carolingian art already Romanesque, we consider, however, it is more convenient to consider both the Carolingian and Ottoman art, in view of the distinctly pronounced Doromanian department of art history. In the Carolingian period, in the center of the artistic movement stood Charlemagne, surrounded by his companions, among whom the most prominent were activities for the benefit of art Alcuin and Eingard. In Ottoman time, the great Saxon emperors, two Henry and three Otto played the role of patrons of art in the artistic life of Germany; but the highest ecclesiastical dignitaries, for example, Archbishop of Trier Egbert, Bishop of Constance Gebgard II, Bishop of Hildesheim Bernvard, Reichenau Abbot Vitigovo, and others were true adherents of artistic development at that time; also in the west of the Frankish state and in Burgundy, church architecture found considerable support in the person of prelates and monks. Cluny, where Abbé Ordon, having reformed the Benedictine order, founded the Cluny congregation in 930, had already become one of the centers of the spiritual and artistic movement, which received worldwide significance in the subsequent epoch.
Under the Merovingians, Northeastern France, with its capital, Paris, was the focus of Frankish artistic life. And under the Carolingians, as was especially proved by Hugo Graf, West Frankish church architecture stood at the head of the direction that was looking for new ways; but when, at the end of the eighth century, Charlemagne moved his residence from Paris to Aachen, the German part of the Frankish state began to come to the fore and artistically; At the same time, the prevalence of palace art caused the strengthening of a conservative, as we called it, direction, which gradually gave way to new trends.
Many first-class French and German scientists were involved in the architecture of the Carolingian-Ottonian era, relying in their research partly on literary sources, partly on the remnants of ancient buildings and on the newest excavations. Interesting are the major works of Viollet-le-Duk, Lasteiri, Schnaze, von Reber, Essenwein, B. Rill, von Degio and von Bezold, Borrmann and Neuvirth, and from the monographs - mainly the works of Georg Schaefer, Adam Golzinger, von Degio, Graf, Fr . - Yak. Schmidt, Schleinig and Effman.
What is new that has developed the Frankish church architecture, is reduced mainly to changes in terms of the basilica. First of all, by lengthening the longitudinal hull beyond the limits of the transept, the plan of the basilica (see above, vn. 1, II, 1) turned from a form of T into a real Latin cross; churches of this very plan we will have in mind when we speak of cruciform basilicas. Then, in those churches in which there were two graves of holy patrons, following the example of some ancient Christian temples of the East (see Fig. 13), a western choir of the same form was often arranged against the eastern choir; as a result, the early Christian western facade with its anchors disappeared and the main entrances moved to the western ends of the side aisles, or to the longitudinal sides. Churches of this kind we call churches with a double choir. The next step was that a second, western one was added to the east transept, and the form of the cross, strictly speaking, was broken. The device under the crypt choir instead of the martyr's grave has now become a general rule; The bell towers, often placed over Sredokrestiy (the intersection of the longitudinal hull with the transept), together with the side towers that soon joined, gradually became organic parts of the church. In the interior, the columns were gradually replaced by columns in whole or in part; in the latter case, the columns and pillars alternated in rhythmic order. The nave in this era has not yet overlapped vaults.
Fig. 89. Plan of St. Gallen abbey. By Degio and Bezold
Some of these features, as is well known, appeared in the West Francis churches of the Merovingian time; but in their full development, although not everywhere at the same time, they are encountered for the first time in the Carolingian architecture, with which we are familiar almost exclusively from literary sources compiled by Julius von Schlosser. These include, for example, the church of Saint-Denis Abbey near Paris, completed by perestroika in 775 by Charlemagne, and the famous Church of St. Riharia in the monastery of Centula (now Saint-Riquier) near Amiens, the construction of which began in 793. These churches had a cross-shaped view and already fully developed double choir. The Carolingian church, built in the IX century on the site of the basilica of St.. Martina on Tour, anticipated the Romanesque style with other architectural features: according to de Lasteira, she already had a choir with a crown of chapels and, in addition to the three eastern towers, two more towers on the sides of the western facade.
On German soil, in a new style, probably, first of all, a church of the famous Benedictine monastery in St. Gallen was built. The local library has a plan of the church (fig. 89) and monastic buildings of approximately 820; here we have in front of us a sample of the Carolingian basilica column with a transept and two choirs, in which most of the above features were shown. A similar plan was formed in the west rather than in the Rhine-Hessian north; this was confirmed by the results of research, from which it is clear that the German-Frankish churches of the Carolingian era did not yet know the true cruciform shape.
Fig. 90. The capital of the column from the church of Sts. Justina. From the photo of Nab
Fig. 91. Gate to the narthex of the monastery church in Lorsch. From the photo of Nab
Partly preserved are two small basilicas, founded by Eingard, the historian of Charlemagne, not alien to art: in Steinbach, near Michelstadt, 827, and in Seligenstadt, 828. They resembled the basilica of St. Michael on the Holy Mountain, near Heidelberg, founded in 883. All these churches, apparently, had a plan in the form of T, an atrium similar to that of the ancient Christian basilicas, and pillars instead of columns. Of the basilic columns to the temples of the same kind, the Church of St., preserved in its essential parts. Justina (fig. 90) in Hechst am Main, built around 840; it is possible that the church of the Corvey Monastery on Weser, a branch monastery of the famous West Franca monastery of Corby, rebuilt in 844, was also a column basilica; this is indicated by four Corinthian columns of the western part of the building erected around 1000 - the columns, which, as proved by Nordhoff, are the only remnants of the Carolingian church. Another ancient church in Lorsch (Hesse) on Bergstrasse, consecrated in 774 in the presence of Charlemagne. Only the gate of the narthex was preserved from it, perhaps even erected a little later (Fig. 91); but this small, elegant structure gives us - precisely because it has been preserved - a clearer concept of the forms of Carolingian architecture than all historical evidence. Three low arches of this gate are flanked by four smooth semi-columns with Roman composite capitals (Fig. 92). The low wall above the spans, with three semicircular windows at the top, is divided by ten barbaric, resembling cannelled Ionic pilasters, connected to one another by triangular bridges instead of arches. The cornice over the composite capitals of the semi-columns is decorated with a row of low and wide standing leaves of acantha. The inconspicuous crowning eaves lie on the toothed consoles. The entire surface of the wall is covered with a pattern like a carpet made up of white and red stones, as we saw in earlier Merovingian buildings. Roman-Hellenistic, Oriental and Frankish elements are mixed in the architecture of this gate, but the Roman-style beginnings are almost completely absent. Lorsh Gate is still quite an ancient Christian building. However, the architect who built them somewhat sinned in proportions, and in facing the walls and zigzags above the pilasters, he conformed to the national taste, which could also be independent of Far Eastern influences. The church itself, which has long been destroyed, must be imagined as a three-nave basilica with a flat surface, without a transept. The original plan of the Savior’s Church in Verdun on Ruhr, founded in 799, is in favor of such a reconstruction. Ludger, but completed only in 875. Effman's research has established that it was also a three-nave basilica with a flat cover and no transverse nave. Apparently, it was the oldest of the German churches, where in the middle nave the columns alternated with pillars.
Fig. 92. Composite capital of the Lorsh Narthex. From the photo of Nab
We know about the form of the other most important German basilicas of the Carolingian time exclusively from literary sources. Old Benedictine Church in Fulda (792–819), tomb of Sts. Boniface, represented in terms of a column basilica with a double choir and two crypts; Two choirs were also built in 831–850. Church of Gersfeld Abbey. Equally, the building, which formed the basis of the Cologne Cathedral, in the first half of the 9th century, apparently had Eastern and Western choirs. But also with respect to these East Frankish churches of the Carolingian era, it has not been proven that they have a cruciform shape.
In Otto-time, on the soil of the German Empire, where until that time only modest wooden architecture was used in most localities, stone church buildings dominated everywhere, and although the great episcopal basilicas of the 10th and the first decades of the 11th century were predominantly rebuilt into the era of the mature Middle Ages, however, their initial outlines emerge from the later stratifications more clearly than in the Carolingian basilicas. Here already quite often there are true cruciform churches, with a developed choir and a transept. Two choruses can be distinguished, for example, in the church laid out in 960 in Gernrode, in the Harz (fig. 93), in the one equipped and, moreover, in the western, transept, Augsburg cathedral, founded in 994, in the church of St. George in Oberzell, on the island of Reichenau (on Lake Constance), founded in 1000, in the Mainz Cathedral (1009–1036), where there is only one western transept, and in the Cathedral of Worms (996–1018), which has one eastern transept; Two choirs and at the same time two crypts are in the Bamberg Cathedral, founded in 1004, and in the church of Sts. Emmerana in Regensburg, two transepts - in the church of sv. Pantaleon in Cologne, 980, two transepts and two choirs - in the Cathedral of Mittelselle on the island of Reichenau (988–997) and in the magnificent church of Sts. Michael (Michaelskirche) in Hildesheim (1001-1033; Fig. 94 and 188), built by a highly talented Bishop Bernward. The arrangement of two choirs instead of one is clear, in fact, only in monasteries, but not in parish churches, which demanded that the main entrance be located opposite the altar and that in this way facilitating access to the church for more believers at once. When urban life began to develop in Germany from the middle of the 11th century and at the same time the parish church became more intense, the churches with two choirs began to go out of use again.
Fig. 93. Plan of the church in Gernrode, in the Harz. By Degio and Bezold
It must be said that in the Ottoman era the basilica still had no cross vaults, with the exception of several cases pointed to by Degio and in which the side naves were blocked with such arches. Only above the crypt was usually arranged vaulted ceiling; such a cryptographic character has the lower floor of the two-story western choir of the church of Corvey Abbey (circa 1000), considered the oldest vaulted church premises in Germany; and since the crypts were rooms with aisles of the same height, the oldest church of Germany with a cross (dome-shaped) arches, the chapel of St. Bartholomew in Paderborn (1017), should be recognized not by the basilica, but by the church hall system (Hallenkirche). Typical German basilicas of Ottoman time with alternating supports, such as, for example, the elegant church with empores in Gernrode mentioned above, in which the columns correctly alternate with the columns, and the monumental church of St. Michael in Hildesheim, where there are two columns between each two pillars, had a completely flat wooden ceiling; even the Northern French churches that are contemporary to them, for example, the old massive basilica with its pillars in Beauvais (987–998) and the church of Sts. Remigia in Reims (1005-1049), have, at least, over the middle nave or flat ceiling, or completely open roof rafters. In the church of sv. Remigia transverse boxy arches overlapped the lower side naves, separated from the middle nave by pillars, but not by empors, in which the pillars nicely alternate with the columns. In Abbey of Cluny, the Church of the Abbot Mayola, consecrated in 981, was also a column-like basilica with a flat covering. In the south of France, where individual forms in this epoch were still completely antique or deliberately imitated antiquity, arches, however, are found, but in a form that had no influence on the development of the Romanesque style itself. The middle nave overlapped with the Korobov vault, the side aisles - with semi-spinal vaults, which transmitted further the lateral spread of the walls of the middle nave. We find such examples in the tenth century in the church of the monastery of Saint-Gilles du Deser in Lower Languedoc and in the old cathedral in Vazon. In the church of sv. Philibert in Tournus, in Burgundy, resting on massive round pillars, the middle nave is covered with transversal duct vaults. But even these buildings can be considered churches of the hall system rather than basilicas.
Fig. 94. Plan of the church of sv. Michael in Hildesheim. By Degio and Bezold
Fig. 95. The capital of the pillar from the church in Gernrode. Around the house
In Provence and Aquitaine, single-nave churches with Korobov arches are found as special forms, resembling similar northern Spanish buildings (see above, Vol. 2, II, 1). But even for this kind of churches, the years of their construction only from the last third of the XI century. become known with certainty.
Fig. 96. Capitals of the castle church and the church of Vipert in Quedlinburg. Around the house
Fig. 97. The capital of one of the most ancient (Bernvardovsky) columns of the church of Sts. Michael in Hildesheim. Around the house
Впрочем, и в немецком зодчестве в течение всего этого периода отдельные архитектурные формы в существенных своих чертах представляются еще дороманскими. Капители колонн по большей части напоминают коринфские, реже — ионические; аттические базы еще не имеют грифов (угловых листиков). Антаблемент над относящимися приблизительно к 844 г. колоннами в западной части церкви Корвейского монастыря — совершенно античный, с дентикулами и шнуром перлов. Колонны упомянутой выше хорошо сохранившейся церкви в Гернроде, оттоновского времени, увенчаны чашевидными капителями, которые усажены завивающимися вверху растительными стеблями и человеческими головами (рис. 95); одна из круглых башен этой церкви украшена снаружи пилястрами, которые, как в Лорше, соединены между собой не арками, а треугольными фронтонами. Капитель с перевернутым эхином, по терминологии Дегио — «грибовидная» капитель, встречающаяся в западной части крипты (997–1021) замковой церкви, в крипте церкви Виперта в Кведлинбурге (рис. 96), в Эссенском соборе и монастырской церкви в Вердене-на-Руре, является скорее искажением, чем преобразованием известных нам форм. Надставки, похожие на имноты, заимствованные, несомненно, из Равенны, мы находим на капителях колонн в ингель-хеймском дворце Карла Великого и в базилике св. Юстина в Гехсте (см. рис. 90). Романские, закругленные внизу кубовидные капители встречаются в Германии лишь изредка и, по исследованиям Дегио, прежде всего в западной части Эссенского собора, затем, в очень простой форме, но с античным шнуром перлов и дентикулами, на двух взятых из старого храма колоннах церкви св. Михаила в Хильдесхейме (см. рис. 95–97), аттические базы которых еще не имеют грифов.
If you look at the carolingian empire. They clearly reveal the whole Carolingian-Ottonian architecture with the ancient world.
Fig. 98. Plan of Aachen Cathedral. By degio and bezold
The main monument to the intense construction activity of Charlemagne - built by Eingard in 796–804. Aachen Cathedral, the palace church of the emperor, intended to be his tomb. We have seen that, even in the early Christian time, the tombs were usually built according to a central plan. Aachen Cathedral in its basic forms is considered an imitation of the Church of St. Equ. Vitali. The main dimensions of both churches are approximately the same; both in the one and in the other, eight middle pillars are supported by arches on which a dome-topped dome with eight arched windows rests. However, according to Strigovsky, this basic architectural idea, which has long found expression in the art of the pre-Christian and ancient Christian East, could have acquired the right of citizenship in the empire of Charlemagne before the construction of the Aachen cathedral. Thanks to their active practice, Aachen architects could independently reach that sobriety, to the consistency and breadth of artistic design that amaze us in this temple. In any case, the individual architectural motifs of Aachen Cathedral have nothing to do with the church of Sts. Vitali. The middle octagon was in the lower low floor surrounded by a sixteen-square walk (fig. 98); because of this, in terms of a detour, alternately quadrangles, covered with cross vaults, and triangles, covered with three-tier arches, turned out to be alternately. The second floor rises high above the empores; its eight arches on the pillars, opening into an octagonal middle space, are twice as high as the arches of the lower floor. Above the octagonal drum rises an octahedral dome, without pandantos. All eaves - an extremely simple profile. The main decoration of the interior of the cathedral was a magnificent mosaic, not preserved to our time; however, in the cathedral there was no lack of architectural decorative elements. So, here were set magnificent columns, written out by Charlemagne the Great from Rome and Ravenna (Fig. 99). Each of the eight high arches, with which the upper floor opens into a middle space, is divided by a cross-beam in half; each half is decorated with the aforementioned pillars, of which the lower ones are interconnected and with the walls enclosing them arches with small semicircular arches, and the upper ones, modeled on the windows in Constantinople St. Sofia, abut right at the bend of the main arches. The balustrade of the upper gallery from the middle of the space is served by stylish bronze lattices; their patterns, consisting of beautifully interwoven columns and crossbars, are framed with pilasters in the ancient genus and rows of acanthic leaves and are seated with rosettes. These lattices, like simple, massive bronze doors, decorated only with lion heads, are poured in Aachen itself.
Fig. 99. The interior of Aachen Cathedral. From a photo of Shtengel
This stately building excited a general surprise and served as a model for many later churches. The chapel of Nimwegen castle reached us, without retaining its original plan; church of sv. John in Luttych (978) rebuilt in the Baroque style; The hexagonal churches in Wimpfen and Metz (Fr.-Jak. Schmidt called them hexagonal basilica) are also not preserved because they were surrounded by a lower twelve-angle walk, as was the decimal baptism of the Cathedral of Worms; but the trilateral western choir of the Essen Cathedral (between 947 and 1000) is perfectly preserved, within which the three sides of the Aachen octagon with capitals of the Corinthian character are repeated. A strikingly faithful copy of the Aachen Cathedral is the interior — outside, albeit not sixteen-sided, but only eight-sided — the church in Ottmarsheim, in Alsace, built between 1000 and 1050. But the capitals of the columns here are no longer Corinthian, but cuboid, romance. However, it cannot be argued that all these buildings were certainly imitations of the Aachen court church; they could and directly go back to those samples as this last one. The church in Germigny des Prés (in the Loire department), built in 806 and unfortunately destroyed in 1463, was built completely independently of it. With her plan, which consisted of nine squares, with an elevated middle square, it resembled a Byzantine church in Rossano, in Lower Italy (see above, Vol. 2, II, 1). Its horseshoe-shaped arches and semicircular niches on each side were compared by Strigovsky with the corresponding elements of Armenian architecture (see books 1, II, 1). Finally, the often well-preserved small church of St. Michael in Fulda (820-822) (Fig. 100), although it belongs, like the Cathedral of Aachen, to the German main churches of the early Middle Ages, however, being round, with a ring-like circumference, can be attributed rather to the same type as the church St. Constance or of sv. Stephen in Rome (see Fig. 27). The inner circumferential wall of the upper floor is supported by eight columns with attic bases and low impost capitals. But the short middle column, which supports the crypt, is crowned with a coarse Ionic capital.
We can’t get a very clear idea about the palace buildings of Charlemagne in Aachen, Nimwegen and Ingelheim even after research by Reber, Clemen and others, the results of which are brought together by C. Simon.
Fig. 100. The interior of the church of sv. Michael in Fulda. With photos Molleguer
The Mainz Museum and Cathedral houses the remains of the Engelheim columns.
But in the descriptions of the residences of the Carolingian and Ottoman emperors, who were left by the chroniclers of these epochs, every now and then the magnificent structures richly decorated with antique columns, marble and precious metals are mentioned, and there is already one legend that Karl the Great is for his buildings in Aachen, and Otto the Great, back in 963, for the Magdeburg Cathedral (now coming to the ruins) were forced to carry heavy antique columns across the Alps, testifies to the unity of the artistic aspirations of the entire Carolingian-Otton century. These aspirations, of course, existed only in that upper stratum of society, for which Latin was the official language; folk architecture, from which no trace was preserved, was still wooden, and its ornamentation should be imagined as a derivative of Merovingian ribbon and animal ornamentation: in the manuscripts of that time, their mutual connection is obvious.
Painting
Monumental wall painting, transplanted on the soil of Gaul, Britain and Germany, along with Italian church architecture, has never ceased to be cultivated in the West. True, the ideas of iconoclasm found an echo on the banks of the Frankish Rhine. Charlemagne, in his German nature, was opposed to the veneration of icons. When the Byzantine Empress Irina at the Second Nicene Council restored the veneration of icons in the East (787) and the triumphant Pope (Adrian I) informed the king of the Franks of the definition of this cathedral, Charlemagne responded by publicizing the famous “Karolinga Books”, which will forever remain a valuable monument German spirit. The worship of icons was condemned, but the decoration of churches and monasteries with sacred images is permitted and even approved. Knowing the mindset of Charlemagne, we have no reason to assume (as Janicz rightly pointed out) that he viewed the patronage of church painting as one of the tasks of his life; in fact, upon careful consideration of the literary sources relating to the Carolingian art, through which one can get acquainted with the monumental painting of the time in question, it turns out that the most famous works, such as the paintings of the imperial court in Aachen, depicting seven free along with allegorical figures the arts of the Spanish wars of Charlemagne, a series of old and New Testament scenes adorning the walls of Aachen Cathedral, or paintings on subjects from world history that were decorated rooms ingelheymskogo palace, were not written under Charlemagne, and under his successors.
For acquaintance with the history of Carolingian painting, the works of Fr. Leitshu, Lip. Janichek and Yul. von Schlossser, who collected tituli, preserved from that time, that is, the signatures under the paintings given in verses by the greatest scientists of the era. All these inscriptions and descriptions are in Latin. And in the artistic themes, as well as in the language of inscriptions, the ancient influence affected. We learn, for example, that the figures of the earth in the form of Cybele with a Grandsky crown (corona muralis) on the head or the heads of four winds with puffy cheeks played a prominent role in Carolingian painting, despite the direct prohibition of Charlemagne to depict these pagan incarnations of nature.
The painters of the Carolingian era were not Italians and not Greeks, but German monastic artists. It is reported, however, that Otto III commissioned the Italian master John to decorate the dome of Aachen Cathedral (circa 997); but it was about mosaic works in which the Franks were less adept. The names of such painters as, for example, Brun in Fulda, Madalolph in Fontanelle (St. Wandrille), are undoubtedly German-Frankish; The Germans were also painters who were called up in the second half of the 9th century from the monastery of Reichenau in St. Gallen.
Fig. 101. The Resurrection of Lazarus. Fresco in the church of sv. George in Reichenau. According to Kraus
In Ottoman times, when Germany and France were already separate states, along with the increase in the number of churches, monumental church painting was becoming more common. From written monuments, we learn, for example, that in the church of Petershausen, near Constance, Old Testament scenes were depicted to the left of the entrance, New Testament scenes to the right; according to the most extensive title series that has come down to us, compiled around 1021 by the Benedictine monk Ekkehard IV, Mainz Cathedral was decorated with old and New Testament images with Old and New Testament images. From this, and perhaps even somewhat earlier time, was preserved in Germany, in the church of Sts. George in Oberzell, on the very island of Reichenau, from which, as we just saw, during the Carolingian era painters in St. Gallen were called, wall paintings, which are more valuable than all written evidence. Here we stand on solid ground. Not only the frescoes were preserved, but also the signatures under them. Unfortunately, the frescoes came from time to time in such a state that copies from them, published by Adler, Kraus and Borrmann, are almost more instructive than the originals themselves. The frescoes on the upper inner walls of the middle nave, painted between 985 and 990, have survived better than others; they are currently tightened on the canvas on which they are reproduced in copies. These murals depict the most important miracles of the Savior; on the south side in four panels arranged in pairs, in two rows, are presented: the Resurrection of Lazarus (fig. 101), the Healing of the Bleeding and the Resurrection of the daughter of Jairus, the Resurrection of the son of Nain's widow and the Healing of ten lepers; on the north side, also in four panels, - the expulsion of a demon near Gerasa, the Healing of a suffering water sickness, the taming of the sea storm and the Healing of the blind child. In addition, in the gaps of the windows there are images of the apostles, restored in the Gothic era, and below, between the arches, - round medallions with sculpted figures of the prophets. Eight main frescoes are bordered on the top and bottom by strips of luxurious, intricately intertwined and developed prospectively meander of late antique style, and from the sides - borders, ornaments of which are partly antique in nature (distorted curls of acantha and strip of rosettes), also partially transform into medieval forms. Biblical scenes found in ancient Christian frescoes and mosaics are more developed and abundant in figures. The scenes of healing the blind and the suffering of water-sickness are arranged relatively calmly and smoothly. The resurrection of the Nainsky youth and the Exile are confused with great drama. There is no mention of the depth of the background, although in the design of buildings one can sometimes notice attempts to create perspectives in the late antique spirit. Antique clothes. Christ is depicted as a beardless youth. The proportions of the figures are wrong, the shape of the body is skinny, and the gestures are completely unnatural. At the very first glance at the pictures, horizontal color stripes against their background are striking: dark blue at the top, greenish blue in the middle, brown at the bottom. The explanation of these bands is most natural to look for in that the artist did not understand the best examples that he used and in which the blue of the sky gradually grew pale downwards, and the color of the earth gradually turned into the tone of the sky.
That this series of compositions is not a Reichenau invention, but should be viewed as a continuation of early Christian art, is ingeniously proved by Schmarsov on the basis of their location. The characteristic features of Byzantine-Greek painting are as invisible here as the direct influence of the monastery of Monte Cassino, a hotbed of Benedictine art. But if the more ancient Christian wall paintings were preserved in Gaul and Germany, we would perhaps be able to determine the transitional steps to this pictorial style, which in general is wild and ancient. The same can be said about the frescoes on the outer side of the western wall, which are now almost completely dead, despite the fact that they are protected by a protrusion of the wall. Below, in the middle niche, is depicted the crucified Christ with the Mother of God and the Apostle John standing at the cross; at the top the entire width of the wall is occupied by the oldest monumental image of the Last Judgment to the north of the Alps (fig. 102). In the middle, a beardless Savior sits on the throne, surrounded by an almond-shaped nimbus (mandorla); beside him, on the right, stands the Mother of God, on the left, an angel with a large cross. Below, twelve apostles sit in long straight benches in various poses, six on each side. In the frieze, beneath them, are depicted opening graves with dead men emerging from them, symmetrically distributed on both sides. Here is the moment preceding the Court: there are still no hellish torments or the bliss of the righteous on the scene. The composition, which in general is not devoid of solemnity and grandeur, reflected the expectation of the end of the world, which made the hearts of all around 1000 tremble. The upper border again forms a magnificent, intricately intertwining meander with two round medallions inserted into it from one side of the other on the other side, which depict the heads of ancient astral deities - the sun and the moon.
Fig. 102. The Last Judgment. Fresco in the church of sv. George in Oberzell. According to Janicek
The manner of execution of all these Oberzelle frescoes is already on the way to turning a painting into a colored outline drawing, but sometimes there are still no black boundaries between individual tones; on the folds of clothes and on the hair there are shadows. It is difficult to say anything about the modeling of heads, hands and feet - with the current state of these frescoes. As for their technical side, they, apparently, were first painted against the background of the Alfresco wall, and then an alsecco layer of paints was applied on them, which included an organic binder. The content of these frescoes touching the soul and the spectacularly decorative distribution of forms and colors were to make a strong impression on the audience.
Very close to the Oberzellsky frescoes in the choir of the choir of St. Sylvester in Goldbach, near Iberlingen, on Lake Constance. They were cleared of plaster that hid them only in 1899 and published in 1902 by F.-K. Kraus. On the eastern, northern and southern walls of the choir are four sedentary figures of the apostles. Among them, probably, Christ sat here, the Judge of the world, but His image was not preserved. Separate panels, as in Oberzella, are bordered on the top and bottom by bands of a meander. Due to the fact that
Что бы оставить комментарий войдите
Комментарии (0)